Poof! Flynn is gone

Just as fast as he came, he has gone

WASHINGTON D.C. (INTELLIHUB) — President Donald Trump’s National Security Adviser Michael Flynn resigned Monday night just after the Justice Department advised White House officials that Flynn could easily be blackmailed by the Russians after exposing his vulnerability to them over the phone.

Flynn’s replacement will be Ret. Army Gen. Keith Kellogg, 72, who has already been abruptly appointed by the Trump Administration as the National Security Adviser (acting).

The media drove a wedge through the Admin. over the weekend after Flynn was alleged to have spoken with a Russian Ambassador about the “sanctions” near the end of Trump’s presidential run and was subsequently investigated through F.B.I. recordings, which so far have turned up no crime.

National Security Advisor Michael Flynn and Gen. Raymond A. “Tony” Thomas, U.S. Special Operations Command Commander, at MacDill, AFB, FL, Feb. 6, 2017. Flynn is in MacDill to join the President who’s visiting senior military leaders and service members of Central Command and Special Operations Command. (DoD photo by D. Myles Cullen/Released)

All of this is causing static and is likely part of a much larger master plan to derail the current regime.

Trump refused to comment on the matter.

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer let the press know that he was “evaluating the situation” and that Vice President Mike Pence received an apology over the phone from a departing Flynn.

Although some press reported Monday that Flynn would continue his duties in the Administration, Intellihub took special care to let the readers know that Flynn’s job was in peril over the friction.

Flynn left a resignation letter which listed why he resigned. In the letter, Flynn wrote that “because of the fast pace of events” he managed to “brief the Vice President-elect and others with incomplete information” pertaining to phone conversations Russian Ambassador.

Flynn made it clear that he was “honored to serve President Trump […] our nation and the American people” and said that the Trump “team will go down in history as one of the greatest presidencies […].”

Michael-Flynn-Resignation-Letter (PDF Version)

Now some within the government, like Connecticut Rep. Chris Murphy feel the Trump-Russia “story” needs to be investigated and are already parroting the old ‘Russian narrative.’

Rep. Chris Murphy tweeted Monday:

CBS News got a little aggressive with the White House in the following excerpt, reporting:

Rep. John Conyers, Jr., D-Mich., the ranking member on the House Judiciary Committee, and Rep. Elijah E. Cummings, D-Md, Ranking Member on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, issued a joint statement saying they were “shocked and dismayed” to learn that law enforcement officials had warned White House counsel Don McGahn that Flynn had given false information to the public about his communications with Russian officials, but the White House “apparently did nothing about it — neither to clarify the truth to the American public or to stop General Flynn from being an ongoing national security concern.”

Trump’s personal stance on the issue is currently unknown.


Michael Flynn Resigns as National Security Adviser — ABCNews.com

©2017. INTELLIHUB.COM. All Rights Reserved.

The post Poof! Flynn is gone appeared first on Intellihub.

Article source link : https://www.intellihub.com/poof-flynn-is-gone/



Spicer: ‘It came down to a matter of trust with Flynn’

‘Flynn committed no known legal violations’

WASHINGTON D.C. (INTELLIHUB) — The White House addressed Michael Flynn’s resignation Tuesday, and said that the president’s reaction was “decisive,” but there had to be some type of “due process” and that’s what took some time.

At the briefing, the corporate press was all over Press Sec. Sean Spicer and kept asking Spicer why it took so long to get rid of Flynn if officials were aware of the situation several weeks ago. However, Spicer held his ground and made it clear that once the president was briefed on the situation that it was only a short time before Gen. Flynn was questioned by officials on several occasions.

“There is nothing that the general did that was a violation of any sort […] What it came down to was a matter of trust,” White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer said in the briefing.

“What it came down to plain and simple was him misleading the Vice President and others and not having a firm grasp on his recollection of that.”

Michael Flynn resigned as the president’s National Security Adviser late Monday as the controversy hit a boiling point.

©2017. INTELLIHUB.COM. All Rights Reserved.

The post Spicer: ‘It came down to a matter of trust with Flynn’ appeared first on Intellihub.

Article source link : https://www.intellihub.com/spicer-it-came-down-to-a-matter-of-trust-with-flynn/



Deep State captures Flynn with en passant move — who’s next?

Trump’s unconventional approach throws Deep State for loop

WASHINGTON D.C. (INTELLIHUB) — In America, once sworn into office the President of the United States (POTUS) becomes the acting C.E.O. for the corporation of the UNITED STATES and goes to work. And yes, the “UNITED STATES” is a corporation, just in case you didn’t already know. It was formed in 1871 and only controls the District of Columbia (Washington D.C.) and territories which the corporation acquires or purchases.

When a POTUS takes the helm on Inauguration Day he or she is then essentially the new 24/7/365 controller for the UNITED STATES. Withal, since the POTUS is not a robot (at least we can only hope) and he or she needs to rest, relax, plan, shower, etc., the Deep State is always there to step in and save the day, taking any unwanted burden off of the POTUS at any given time. It’s almost like having a personal maid or assistant. Indeed, after awhile, a POTUS can get quite comfortable and may enjoy taking full advantage of the lavish apparatus waiting in the wings.

What’s more, C.I.A. and other intelligence ties to a POTUS usually dictate what top-down information the POTUS is privy to and the methodology that will be used to feed it to them. For instance: Is the POTUS receiving a ‘standard meal’ or a ‘force feeding?’

During Barack H. Obama’s tenure, I guess you could say, he was eating the ‘standard meal’ in such a way that he became apathetic, all the while allowing the Deep State free rein to the corporation. And we all know how that goes — countless executive orders, no-bid contracts, money laundering, you name it, that’s how they do it, that’s how they loot the corporation of the UNITED STATES. These people have no allegiance, they are toilet fish, i.e. pond scum for that matter.

The Deep State (A.K.A. the National Security Racketeering Network) and all that encompasses it, both good and bad, which includes but is not limited to, all of its quantum computers, all of its spooks (the C.I.A.), its techies, all of its operatives, and the entire Continuity of Government Program (COG) combined, serves as a crutch for the POTUS if need be. And seems how pretty much every president since John F. Kennedy’s assassination has had substantial C.I.A. ties or direct and association with the agency, as in the case of George H.W. Bush and Obama, one can only assume that most presidents simply hit the Ol’ cruise control button after they entered the White House, signaling the Deep State to streamline everything, ultimately putting the Deep State in control. Although this process is not as passive as I made it sound, it’s more like the C.I.A. directs their operative, which is usually the sitting POTUS, to do exactly as they say. The president is more often than not just a puppet per se, an actor, the acting C.E.O. of the corporation. But the tables have recently turned.

You see, with Trump’s unexpected win, the powers-that-be (the entire Deep State apparatus) are having a hard time facilitating their normal spectrum of control due to Trump’s unconventional approach to just about everything and the fact that Trump is not a cutout in the first place. Trump has literally forced them to rewrite their standard issue playbook. The very thought being powerless, even if only for a mere second, weighs heavy on these people’s minds. Just like in the Wizard of Oz, they are generally the people behind the curtain who pull the strings.

Trump is his own animal. An unusual character with extremely honed skills in many areas. And he is not going to always do things the traditional way because he’s quite aware of what I am explaining here in this piece. Moreover, Trump also knows that the Deep State is hovering over his shoulder, monitoring every phone call, every conversation, lurking, waiting for any opportunity to arise which the Deep State can then use to pounce in order to restore power back to their well-greased machine.

You can almost look at the Deep State like Skynet from the Terminator movies. At all times Skynet wanted full control, yet, in a sense, Skynet was always entirely out of control.

The most recent en passant move by the powers-that-be to remove Gen. Michael Flynn from the grand chessboard was well done on their part. Not that I agreed with it or anything — it was just a brilliant move. Don’t get me wrong, for sure I would have rather seen Flynn stay as the president’s National Security Advisor because I thought he was going to be a good one. But the bottom line is, Flynn was taken out by the Deep State and with ease. Like I said, the move was en passant. But the swiftness and timing of it lead some to believe that the roots of this may go deeper, even getting into Podesta email or Pizzagate territory.

Intellihub’s Alex Thomas reported Tuesday:

We now know that Flynn wasn’t actually targeted over phone calls with a Russian ambassador but rather was a victim of a full-scale operation to take him out.

This operation, conducted by Obama operatives, elements of the intelligence community, and the establishment media, was a direct effort to counter not only investigations into possible elite pedophile rings but also to take out a fierce critic of the corrupt intelligence community leaders.

Now we have to wonder what Trump’s ultimate response will be. We also have to wonder what the Deep State’s next move will be as the ‘Russian narrative’ is already culminating throughout the corporate media once again.

These people will stop at nothing to assure they get one of their prized players back onto the field and they mean business. By any means possible they will press to remove Trump from the presidency altogether, but this will all likely come down to a contrived technicality which the outgoing Obama Admin laid the groundwork for. It looks like the media is trying to roll out the ‘Russian narrative’ and may even actually attempt to prove that someone inside the administration somehow has or had ties. And if the Deep State succeeds, which I hope they don’t, don’t be surprised if they don’t try and roll out Michelle Obama as their trojan horse, the silent knight.

A recent poll on Twitter shows that Michelle Obama would have no chance as POTUS, but shockingly it appears that Obama’s hard left Organizing For Action group is already preparing for a potential run of the former first lady behind the scenes.

Can Trump adapt fast enough to the mob mentality, become super hardcore, Hulk out and fight back big league?

Shepard Ambellas is an opinion journalist and the founder and editor-in-chief of Intellihub News & Politics (Intellihub.com). Shepard is also known for producing Shade: The Motion Picture (2013) and appearing on Travel Channel’s America Declassified (2013). Shepard is a regular contributor to Infowars. Read more from Shep’s World. Get the Podcast. Follow Shep on Facebook and Twitter.
©2017. INTELLIHUB.COM. All Rights Reserved.
Featured Image: Uddhav Gupta/Flickr

The post Deep State captures Flynn with en passant move — who’s next? appeared first on Intellihub.

Article source link : https://www.intellihub.com/deep-state-captures-flynn-whos-next/



Global pedophilia rings exposed and arrested – Where’s U.S. press coverage?

“Pizzagate” is a familiar pop culture buzzword and everyone probably knows what it means or that it is affiliated with sexual abuse of children, especially in Washington, DC.

However, there has been breaking news about world-wide arrests regarding pedophilia, but the U.S. media and television—other than CBS journalist Ben Swann in Atlanta, Georgia—have not investigated the problem to expose it and its perpetrators.?

In Canada, a recent Project Spade press conference took place, which you can listen to here.

The U.S. Postal Service was represented at the Toronto press conference.  How come the U.S. press has not covered that international event?  Some children as young as five years old were involved.  What a scourge upon society!  By the way, have you heard the rumblings that some want to have pedophilia made legal?  What is wrong with society?

How high up the professional ladders do these sick activities go; who will be exposed and how soon—barring none at any level of involvement, including the swamp in Washington, DC, which has been alleged to be crawling with pedophiles in all levels of government.  Why isn’t the U.S. media investigating and reporting on it?  What say you Washington Post?

Here’s coverage of a California pedophilia bust, which ought to make people wonder why it wasn’t national front page news plus a short clip on the DA’s press conference on sexual exploitation arrests across southern California.

Lastly, a huge pedophilia-sex operation was exposed in Norway.  Did you hear anything about that on the nightly news?  Here’s some of the information that surfaced:

Norwegian police have filed charges against 51 people suspected of various kinds of abuse of children including babies. Even the future abuse of yet unborn children was discussed in the country’s largest ever pedophile ring. [1] [CJF emphasis added]

Truly one of the sick, sad and pathetic parts about pedophilia is those who are educated and should know better.

Several perpetrators were obviously familiar to their immediate environments. Family and friends reacted with shock when they were arrested. Perpetrators come from all walks of life, many of them have a higher education, possess high IT skills and have used encryption to hide their tracks,” prosecutor Janne Ringset Heltne told NRK. [1]   [CJF emphasis added]

Abuse of children at any level, in any form/format, including vaccines neurotoxic ingredients, has to stop, and all responsible government agencies must be made to deal with it whether they like it or not, or want to or not, since, apparently, many at the top may be involved.

Via Activist Post


[1] https://sputniknews.com/europe/201611241047790760-norway-pedophile-ring-busted/

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.
Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.
Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.
Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)
Catherine’s NEW book: Eat To Beat Disease, Foods Medicinal Qualities ©2016 Catherine J Frompovich is now available.
Featured Image:  banspy/Flickr

The post Global pedophilia rings exposed and arrested – Where’s U.S. press coverage? appeared first on Intellihub.

Article source link : https://www.intellihub.com/global-pedophilia-rings-exposed-and-arrested-where-is-us-press-coverage/



Arguing immigration with a compassionate liberal -or- How to twist your head into a pretzel

Arguing with a liberal about the economic impact of rampant immigration will twist your brain into a pretzel. It inevitably goes something like this:

“Illegal aliens and legal immigrants are taking millions of our jobs.”

“No, they’re not.”

“Then they’re all on welfare.”

“No, they’re not. Even most undocumented workers are productive members of society.”“How are they productive if they’re not taking jobs?”

“Undocumented workers are only taking jobs American’s don’t want.”

“Americans don’t want those jobs because migrant workers have been taking them for so many decades that wages have remained stagnant at a level that only a totally desperate person would work for. That is exactly how they are hurting us by taking jobs. They are not just taking up jobs, but they are keeping wages suppressed because Americans would have to reduce themselves to living like many migrant workers in substandard housing and driving badly broken vehicles in order to stay alive at those wages if they accepted those jobs.”

“Migrants only live at that level because they are forced to.”

“Exactly. They are forced to because the pay for those jobs never goes up because they are willing to live at that level out of desperation if that is what it takes to stay alive, and you’re willing to exploit them.”

“And if migrant workers didn’t do that, you’d have to pay more for all the food you eat. Do you really want to pay more for everything?”

Maintaining a peasant immigrant labor class is what it is really all about

And that, you see, is the bottom line — cheap labor via a peasant class. We don’t want to pay more for everything, so we turn a blind eye to the cheap, illegal labor and keep the peasants coming, regardless of the social costs of maintaining a peasant class.

They are truly peasants, not just because of their living conditions, but because they supposedly have no voting rights (debatable). They have no say in the laws that govern them so live by the rules of another class of people, and they have to keep their heads low to keep from being deported. That means they dare not complain about working conditions either, as Americans most certainly would.

Peasants have to take what they get. That’s why we keep them illegal, and why we just catch and release them, letting them stay here in spite of the fact we know they have no legal right to because we just caught them crossing the border. It all forces them to keep their heads low … until one day they rise enough in numbers that they don’t keep their heads low any longer, and the peasants revolt against their slavish conditions.


What about the compassionate liberal argument for immigrant labor

At this point, the liberal turns to the compassion argument, since the economic argument for immigrant labor leads to ruin. The compassionate argument runs like this, this time started by the liberal:

“You are mean and cruel for wanting to kick a million and a half undocumented workers out of this country.”

“No more mean and cruel than you are for insisting on keeping out the hundreds of millions more people who want in but are kept out because they respect our immigration laws.

“I don’t insist on keeping anyone out.”

“Of course you do. Otherwise, you’d spend all this protest energy trying to get the government to declare open borders to the whole world and let in everyone who wants in so long as they’re not criminals.”

“There wouldn’t be that many that would come in anyway.”

“Eliminate all immigration laws, except those barring criminals, and find out.”

“That is ridiculous. We have to have some reasonable limits because we cannot absorb hundreds of millions all at once.”

“So, you only want to keep out the ones who are respecting the legal process but keep in all the ones that jumped ahead of them in line? I want to kick out 1.5 million or more who jumped ahead in line, but you want to keep out hundreds of millions, and that makes you more compassionate?”

“Yes, it does. We cannot absorb hundreds of millions. It’s ridiculous. I would if we could, but it’s not even possible.”

“So, there is nothing wrong with having immigration laws, but just with enforcing them?”

“Yes, that’s mean and cruel because you are breaking up families.”

“Didn’t they know that was the huge risk they took in breaking the law and coming into the country illegally — that it might be really messy when they’re forced to leave?”

“You’re a racist with no heart.”

“What if I’m of English descent and also don’t want 1.5 million illegal aliens from the UK?”

“You’re English? See, I knew you were racist.”

“What if I just don’t want more people of any color, including my own, because we already have too many people in the US?”

“Why don’t you just leave the country and solve the problem then?”

“Aren’t you the one who promised you would leave if Trump was elected? Why should I just force the problem onto some other nation? You see, at one time, we had a vast land we wanted to occupy in order to keep the Indians from having it all, so bringing in immigrants was the only way to occupy all of it. But I think we’re full, and we can stop now.”

“See, you’re a racist.”

“No, I love Indians and even have some as relatives; but I’ll bet the Indians would have been glad to have a lot fewer migrants, too, starting with the Mayflower. Look, my point is that there was once a lot of land available. Now the land is overstrained. We don’t need more housing developments all over the countryside. Don’t need more congested streets and more auto pollution and more petroleum consumption. Don’t need more landfills filling up faster and more sewage, and we don’t even have enough potable water in the places that want immigrants the most. There is simply no way to bring in millions more people without adding to all those problems because we’re full now. The land simply cannot absorb more without it having a negative impact.”

“That makes no sense. We’d have no economy if we stopped immigration. We have to keep bringing in people so that we have people to build housing for. Building those developments is what keeps the economy perking.”

“So, we need all of our cities to endlessly grow like Mexico city or like California has been doing and never stop increasing the population because that is the only way to sustain a healthy economy? Is that the Californian version of sustainability? California has grown to where it doesn’t even have enough water for all of its people without going to another state to get it. So, doesn’t water, at least, force a point at which you say population growth is enough already? Yet, California wants immigrants more than any state. Where is it going to get the additional water?”

“That is ridiculous. Haven’t you seen that it is raining in California now? They’ve solved this problem. They now need more people in order to drink the water fast enough to keep their reservoirs from overflowing and breaking their damn dams.”

“Maybe they just want to use all those people to fill the holes in the dam and plug the damn leaks.”

“That’s horrible. They want them because they are compassionate.”

“Then why are they so uncompassionate toward the millions of others that they keep out with immigration laws? Maybe they just don’t need all those others to pick their oranges for a penny each and mow their lawns at a nice low price. Maybe they just want enough to keep the price stable and low.”

“That is a racist comment that assumes migrant workers are only good for mowing lawns and picking crops.”

“It’s not me bringing them all in and then paying them poorly for mowing my lawn. I mow my own lawn. Isn’t that the situation you’re keeping all of them in? Why don’t you pay them more so they can live like you in a house right beside you, instead of mow your lawn and then return to their trailer? You know, open the community gates.”

“That is ridiculous. Why is that my responsibility? I pay my gardeners fine. I pay them as much as anyone else does. I cannot help what the economy will bare.”

“Of course you can, because maintaining such a huge supply of immigrant workers, especially the cheaper illegal ones, makes sure the cost of their labor stays low for you.”

And there we are, full circle. It’s all about maintaining a peasant class for the privileged. How else will they enjoy a liberal lifestyle?

Via Great Recession

The post Arguing immigration with a compassionate liberal -or- How to twist your head into a pretzel appeared first on Intellihub.

Article source link : https://www.intellihub.com/arguing-immigration-with-a-compassionate-liberal-or-how-to-twist-your-head-into-a-pretzel/